Neither HR Director, nor Marketing Director, But Disciplined Business Leader!

Last night I attended a HR Magazine Leaders Club event somewhat provocatively titled ‘Is the Marketing Director the new HR Director?’. It was an excellent event.

Those who have visited this blog before will know this is a subject close to my heart. It is also bubbling up as a hot topic. Ironically I was facilitating a session not more than two months ago for the European Sponsorship Association where the discussion turned to whether the ‘HR Director is the new Marketing Director’. There’s clearly a little insecurity both sides of the fence!

Navjot Singh, Global Marketing Manager, Recruitment and Global Communications Manager at Shell talked compellingly about how marketing know-how had been integrated into Shell’s recruitment strategy to take them from also-ran to leader in high potential recruitment among their competitors. He shared how the use of behaviour models (as marketers would use every day to model customer activity) were used at Shell to predict the behaviour of job applicants through the process. Shell can not only predict the potential revenue that any new recruit would bring into the organisation, but also predict each individual’s performance once in the organisation.

On one level, yes, these are tools which are now beloved of the bigger marketing departments. For ‘job applicants’ in HR’s world, read ‘potential customers’ in marketing’s. For ‘performance once in the organisation’ in HR speak, read ‘lifetime customer value’ in marketing. However, on another level none of these skills are purely the preserve of HR, or marketing, or both. They are exactly the same techniques one might use valuing a business for acquisition, or deciding whether to spend money on a new factory or product launch. They are simply good business practice in a lean, less indulgent business environment.

For those of you who were good enough to read my last post, you may feel there is an inherent contradiction in this view given my criticism of the ‘commodity trading’ I witnessed at the CIPD Fair. I do not mean to criticise the process of using data to make decisions (quite the opposite in fact). I mean to criticise the laziness of organisations who use the data as not just as the rationale, but also the principle means of communication. To cite an example given last night, the organisation that recruits online, but never sends a tailored, thought-through rejection letter to the unsuccessful candidate with some insightful feedback. I was party to another conversation last week with a friend, where restructuring decisions had been communicated only within the context of total headcount reduction figures. No rationale for the change, or compelling thoughts about what the future might hold.

In my view, good business management practice is the insightful use of data to reach a conclusion. Good business leadership equates to be able to share the story behind those conclusions in a credible and authentic way with each and every stakeholder group - whether the leadership comes from HR or marketing. 

Navjot painted a picture of a world in the future where companies are applying to prospective high potential employees for their service, rather than the other way around. We are definitely seeing that the HR and Marketing communities need each other like never before. The biggest challenge, however, is that both these groups need access to a third set of skills – that of world class 21st century business management. Neither HR nor marketing will lead until they can manage – otherwise each simply offers a world of empty promises.